# Illustration of k value effect on outlier score

Continuing with the previous post, here, I will illustrate how outlier scores vary while considering different k values. The context of below figure is already explained in my previous post.

After running the LOF algorithm with following R code lines


library(Rlof) # for applying local outlier factor
library(HighDimOut) # for normalization of lof scores
set.seed(200)
df <- data.frame(x = c( 5, rnorm(2,20,1), rnorm(3,30,1), rnorm(5,40,1), rnorm(9,10,1), rnorm(10,37,1)))
df$y <- c(38, rnorm(2,30,1), rnorm(3,10,1), rnorm(5,40,1), rnorm(9,20,1), rnorm(10,25,1)) #pdf("understandK.pdf", width = 6, height = 6) plot(df$x, df$y, type = "p", ylim = c(min(df$y), max(df$y) + 5), xlab = "x", ylab = "y") text(df$x, df\$y, pos = 3, labels = 1:nrow(df), cex = 0.7)
dev.off()
lofResults <- lof(df, c(2:10), cores = 2)
apply(lofResults, 2, function(x) Func.trans(x,method = "FBOD"))



We get the outlier scores for 30 days on a range of k = [2:10] as follows:

Before explaining results further, I present the distance matrix as below, where each entry shows the distance between days X and Y. Here, X represents row entry and Y represents column entry.

Let us understand how outlier scores get assigned to day 1 on different k’s in the range of 2:10. The neighbours of point 1 in terms of increasing distance are:

Here the first row represents neighbour and the second row represents the distance between point 1 and the corresponding point. While noticing the outlier values of point 1, we find till k = 8, outlier score of point 1 are very high (near to 1). The reason for this is that the density of  k neighbours of point 1 till k = 8 is high as compared to point 1. This results in higher outlier score to point 1. But, when we set k = 9, outlier score of point 1 drops to 0. Let us dig it deep further. The 8th and 9th neighbours of point 1 are points 18 and 17 respectively. The neighbours of point 18 in increasing distance are:

and the neighbours of point 17 are:

Observe carefully, that 8th neighbour of point 1 is point 18, and the 8th neighbour of point 18 is point 19. While checking the neighbours of point 18 we find that all of its 8 neighbours are nearby (in cluster D). This results in higher density for all k neighbours of point 1 till 8th neighbour as all these points are densest as compared to point 1, and hence point 1 with lesser density gets high anomaly score. On the other hand, 9th neighbour of point 1 is point 17 that has 9th neighbour as point 3. On further checking, we find that for all the points which are in cluster D now find their 9th neighbour  either in cluster A or cluster B. This essentially decreases the density of all the considered neighbours of point 1. As a result, now all the points including point 1 and its 9 neighbours have densities in the similar range and hence point 1 gets low outlier score.

I believe that this small example explains how outlier scores vary with different k’s. Interested readers can use the provided R code to understand this example further.

# Intuitive​ meaning of k range in Local Outlier Factor (LOF)

The Local Outlier Factor (LOF) is a well-known outlier detection algorithm. In the previous post, I noted down the steps of LOF and here I will discuss its k parameter.  The k parameter often lands the users of LOF into difficulty, but while looking at the meaning of k parameter and the respective application domain, I find it is easy to select a k range. The authors of LOF suggest to use a range of k values instead of using a selective value. This is because we cannot generalise a particular value of k over various datasets following diverse underlying data distributions. Now, let us understand how to select lower (lwrval) and upper (uprval) values of the k range.

To explain it further, let us consider a simple scenario shown in below figure

This figure shows the energy consumption of some imaginary home for one month (30 days). Each small circle represents energy consumption of a particular day, where a number above the circle shows the corresponding day of the month.  Nearby circles marked within red clusters  (A, B, C, D, E) represent days that follow a similar pattern in energy consumption as compared to remaining days.

To use LOF on such a dataset, we need to set the range of k values instead of a single k value. Note that lwrval and uprval are domain dependent. According to LOF paper, lwrval and uprval are defined as:

• lwrval: This refers to the minimal cluster size which consists of similar behaving points, and we believe this similarity is not due to some random cause. This means that we assume a cluster with a size lower than lwrval represent outliers. For example, if I consider lwrval = 3, then clusters A and B represent outliers because none of the points within these clusters has three more similar points/neighbours. At the same time, points within clusters C, D, and E represent normal points because each of them has three more like neighbours.
• uprval: This suggests to the upper optimal number of points to be similar. In other words, we believe that uprval number of points must be similar in the considered application domain. For example, In the energy domain, I know that at least for 6 days (working days of a week) energy consumption is similar due to the occupancy behaviour. So, I set the uprval = 6. No doubt there can be a cluster with size greater than uprval, but our reasoning on a specific dataset motivates us for some optimal uprval. Consider an another example where we assume that occupants of a home change on a weekly basis – say there were 5,  10, 15, and 20 occupants on the first, second, third and fourth week of a month respectively. Consequently, the energy consumption on four different weeks should be similar intra-week and different inter-week. This example suggests that we should get four clusters corresponding to four weeks and the size of each cluster should be 7 (number of weekdays). So, our uprval is 7 in this example.

I believe now lwrval and uprval limits can be easily interpreted for any application domain. Therefore, according to original LOF paper now we can calculate LOF outlier values on a set of k values defined by lwrval and uprval. In the next post, I will explain the above figure further and show how a particular k value effects outlier score.

# Area Under the Curve (AUC): A performance metric

Consider a scenario where we have observations defined by the associated attributes. Further, assume that we know the actual class label of each observation as shown in below figure. [Note: this data is random and there is no relation between I/O]

Mostly, classifiers predict output in the form of categorical labels, but there are instances where a classifier outputs final result in the form of a score, say a score in the range of [0, 1]. The above snapshot figure shows such a instance, where our classifier predicts output in the form of a score (shown in predicted Label column).

Till this, everything is ok, but the question is how can we compute the performance of such classifiers. I mean, well-known metrics like precision and recall are impossible to compute for such scenarios! Although, humans can attach meaning to theses numbers/score, say we consider a threshold value on predicted label, and the values higher than the threshold are labelled as Z and the values below the threshold are labelled as Y.  On assuming a threshold of 0.8, we get something like this

Now, we have categorical labels both in the prediction column and in actual label column. Is it fair now to compute metrics like precision and recall ? Wait, we might get different results for precision and recall if we consider different threshold. Now, it is really troublesome to compute existing well-known metrics for these type of scenarios.

For such type of scenarios, we use another metric known as Area Under the Curve (AUC). The curve is known by the name of Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC). The ROC curves corresponding to four (A, B, C, and D) different classifiers/methods are shown in below figure as

The true positive rate  (TPR) give information about correctly identified instances while as false positive rate (FPR) gives information about misclassified instances. The ideal ROC curve have a TPR of 1 and FPR of 0. To extract the meaningful information from these ROC curves, we use AUC value which represents the area under the considered ROC curve. The AUC value ranges between [0, 1]. A value of 1 represents ideal/perfect performance and value of 0.5 represents random (50/50) performance.

The AUC value is computed at various thresholds. So, we can say that the final AUC value is not biased by a single threshold.

# LaTeX for Complex Stuff

In this post, I will keep updating solutions to common problems we face while preparing LaTeX manuscripts.

Customise the width of any cell in a table: First include package pbox. Then, cell contents of a table will go like this \pbox{5cm}{blah blabh}. Even the contents of cell can be forced to next line by using double backslash, i.e., \\

Customise width of entire table column: In this case, instead of mentioning l,c,r options of tabular environment for the said column, use p with width . For example \begin{tabular}{|r|c|p{4cm}} [Reference]

Present table in landscape style  [Ref]: Add necessary packages and the syntax to show table in landscape mode is as

\usepackage{floats,lscape}
\begin{landscape}
\begin{table}
…table stuff…
\end{table}
\end{landscape}

Place text and Figure side by side:

\usepackage{wrapfig}
\begin{wrapfigure}{r}{4cm} //first option is placement (l,r), second width
\includegraphics[]{abc.pdf}
\caption{}
\label{}
\end{wrap figure}

Show complete paper reference (title, author name, etc) without citation:

\usepackage{bibentry}
\nobibliography*

Write above two lines in the document heading in the same order, and then in the main document, for citing purpose write  \bibentry{paperkey}

Shrink a table if it moves outside the text area:

Use resizebox as explained in this Stackoverflow answer.